Premature Withdrawal From Employees Provident Fund (Section 192A)

Written by: CAANKUR KUMAR Posted on: 31 January, 2023

Section 192A
Premature withdrawal from Employees Provident Fund 

Compliance with Rule 9 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule Certain Concerns - Under the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF & MP Act, 1952), certain specified employers are required to comply with the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 (EPFS). However, these employers are also permitted to establish and manage their own private provident fund (PF) scheme subject to fulfillment of certain conditions.

The provident funds established under a scheme framed under EPF & MP Act, 1952 or Provident Fund exempted under section 17 of the said Act and recognised under the Income-tax Act, 1961 are termed as Recognised Provident fund (RPF) under the Act.

Part A of the Fourth Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961 contains the provisions relating to RPFs. Under the existing provisions of Rule 8 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule, the withdrawal of accumulated balance by an employee from the RPF is exempt from taxation.

For the purpose of discouraging pre-mature withdrawal and promoting long term savings, if the employee makes withdrawal before continuous service of five years (other than the cases of termination due to ill health, contraction or discontinuance of business, cessation of employment etc.) and does not opt for transfer of accumulated balance to the new employer, the withdrawal would be subject to tax.

Rule 9 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule provides the manner of computing the tax liability of the employee in respect of such pre-mature withdrawal. In order to ensure collection of tax in respect of such pre-mature withdrawals, Rule 10 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule casts responsibility on the trustees of the RPF to deduct tax as computed in Rule 9 at the time of payment.

Rule 9 provides that the tax on withdrawn amount is required to be calculated by re- computing the tax liability of the years for which the contribution to RPF has been made by treating the same as contribution to unrecognized provident fund. The trustees of private provident fund schemes, are generally a part of the employer group and hence, have access to or can easily obtain the information regarding taxability of the employee making pre-mature withdrawal for the purposes of computation of the amount of tax liability under Rule 9.

However, it may not always be possible for the trustees of EPFS to get the information regarding taxability of the employee such as year-wise amount of taxable income and tax payable for the purposes of computation of the amount of tax liability under Rule 9.

Applicability and Rate of TDS 

Section 192A provides for deduction of tax on premature taxable withdrawal from employees provident fund scheme. Accordingly, in a case where the accumulated balance due to an employee participating in a recognized provident fund is includible in his total income owing to the provisions of Rule 8 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule not being applicable, the trustees of the Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 or any person authorised under the scheme to make payment of accumulated balance due to employees are required to deduct income-tax @10%.

Time of tax deduction at source  

Tax should be deducted at the time of payment of accumulated balance due to the employee.

Non-applicability of TDS under section 192A 

No tax deduction is to be made under this section, if the amount of such payment or aggregate amount of such payment to the payee is less than ₹50,000.

Deduction at maximum marginal rate in case of non-submission of PAN 

Any person entitled to receive any amount on which tax is deductible under this section has to furnish his PAN to the person responsible for deducting such tax. In case he fails to do so, tax would be deductible at the maximum marginal rate.

ILLUSTRATION 1 

Mr. Mahesh, an employee of M/s. Tata Power Ltd. since 10-04-2018, resigned on 31-03-2022 and withdrew ₹60,000 being the balance in his EPF account. Discuss with reasons whether the provisions of Chapter XVII-B are attracted and if so, what is the net amount receivable by the payee, Mr. Mahesh?

SOLUTION - As per section 192A, in a case where the accumulated balance due to an employee participating in a recognized provident fund is includible in his total income owing to the provisions of Rule 8 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule not being applicable, the trustees of the Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 or any person authorised under the scheme to make payment of accumulated balance due to employees are required to deduct income-tax@10% at the time of payment of accumulated balance due to the employee.

Tax deduction at source has to be made only if the amount of such payment or aggregate amount of such payment of the payee is  ₹50,000 or more.

Rule 8 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule, inter alia, provides that only if an employee has rendered continuous service of five years or more with the employer, then accumulated balance in a recognized provident fund payable to an employee would be excluded from the total income of that employee.
 
In the present case, Mr. Mahesh has withdrawn an amount exceeding ₹50,000 on his resignation after rendering a continuous service of four years with M/s. Tata Power Ltd. Therefore, tax has to be deducted at source @10% under section 192A on ₹60,000, being the amount withdrawn on his resignation without rendering continuous service of a period of five years with M/s. Tata Power Ltd.
 
The net amount receivable by Mr. Mahesh is  ₹54,000 [i.e.  ₹60,000 –  ₹6,000, being tax deducted at source].
 
Note – It is assumed that Mr. Mukesh has furnished his permanent account number (PAN) to the person responsible for deducting tax at source. Otherwise, tax would be deductible at the maximum marginal rate. It may be noted that with effect from 1.6.2015 such employee can furnish declaration in Form No.15G for non-deduction of tax at source under section 192A by virtue of section 197A(1A).
Disclaimer: Although all provisions, notifications and updates, are analyzed in-depth by our team before writing to the public. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The Guide, Articles, Blogs, FAQ and videos is to provide updated information. Tax matters are always subject to frequent changes hence advisory is only for the benefit of the general public. Hence neither TaxSmooth nor any of its Team members is liable for any consequence that arises on the basis of these write-ups.
INDEX